Catheter use in gynaecological practice

M R C O G PA R T 2 · S O S P O C K E T C A R D · K N O W L E D G E A R E A 4 – P O S T O P E R AT I V E C A R E

Catheter Use in Gynaecological Practice Aslam N, Moran PA. Catheter use in gynaecological practice. TOG 2014;16:161–168. doi:10.1111/tog.12102

4 3 3 CORE TOPIC AREAS COVERED LEARNING OBJECTIVES ETHICAL ISSUES HIGHLIGHTED

DO N' T-M IS S FA C TS

1. Full text unavailable – these notes reflect the abstract only; verify all detail against the original TOG article before exam use

2. Four key content areas: indications, types of catheter, early vs delayed removal evidence, complications

3. Ethical focus: consent, patients at high risk of long-term catheterisation, and indwelling urethral vs suprapubic catheter choice for long-term use

4. Published in the TOG Urogynaecology collection, 2014;16:161–168

NOTE

This pocket card is built from abstract-level content only. No numerical evidence (e.g. removal-timing outcome data, complication rates) was available in the source; consult the full TOG article for these details.

ABBREVIATION KEY

TOG — The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist MRCOG — Membership of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists

Notes prepared from Aslam N, Moran PA. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2014;16:161–168 · doi:10.1111/tog.12102 · Based on abstract-level source content only – full text could not be retrieved; verify against the original TOG article for additional detail.

Source: The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (TOG), RCOG journal — Aslam N, Moran PA. Catheter use in gynaecological practice. TOG 2014;16:161–168. doi:10.1111/tog.12102

Clinically reviewed by NHS obstetricians and gynaecologists

MRCOG AI is an independent educational tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG).